Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Jerry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete and redirect to Lost Tribe. Randykitty (talk) 15:54, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Red Jerry

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Curriculum Vitae for promoting non-notable guy that struggles to find a career. damiens.rf 16:34, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No evidence of notability. --Λeternus ^(talk) 19:40, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or redirect notable for Hooj Choons, and also (but not mentioned in his article) as member of duo Lost Tribe. If there isn't enough verifiable information for a separate article, maybe redirect to Hooj Choons, where Lost Tribe can also be mentioned (as their hit single was on the label). Peter James (talk) 15:09, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Being in a notable band does not by itself confer notability on each band member. --Epeefleche (talk) 19:01, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Membership of a notable band could be a reason to redirect to the band, but Red Jerry is more notable for the record label. Peter James (talk) 19:09, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The same applies -- being a principal in a notable record label does not ipso facto make each principal themselves notable. And here, the notability of the record label itself looks questionable, IMHO. Epeefleche (talk) 19:29, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:42, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:39, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.